Showing posts with label vision. Show all posts
Showing posts with label vision. Show all posts

Wednesday, April 15, 2015

Visual Perception in the Brain of a Jumping Spider

reposted from

See the lab video too
http://www.cornell.edu/video/vision-in-jumping-spiders

Visual Perception in the Brain of a Jumping Spider

Deciphering how a jumping spider sees the world and processes visual information may yield insights into long-standing robotics problems.
By  | April 1, 2015
  • Link this
  • Stumble
DON’T CALL ME FOUR-EYES: Jumping spiders have four pairs of eyes that work in concert to help them sense and capture prey.IMAGE COURTESY OF GIL MENDA
Gil Menda was bored. It was 2012, and his research on facial recognition in wasps was going nowhere. The Cornell University graduate student turned to his advisor, neurophysiologist Ron Hoy, as the professor was running out the door to teach a class. There were jumping spiders in the lab already, so Menda asked for permission to attempt the impossible: to tap into the central nervous system of an arachnid that was far more liable to depressurize and die than sit still for brain surgery. Hoy assented.
It was a problem that had vexed biologists for decades, says Paul Shamble, an arachnologist who was then a fellow Cornell graduate student. The jumping spider is unusual among arachnids, most of which have relatively poor vision compared to insects, even though arachnids have four pairs of eyes. While most spiders build webs and wait for their prey to come to them, the jumping spider stalks and pounces much like a cat, displaying remarkable visual acuity, despite having a brain no larger than a poppy seed.   
By the time Hoy returned from teaching his class, Menda had succeeded in his efforts. Using an ultrathin metal wire, he’d gently poked a hole in the spider’s cuticle that was small enough to self-heal. A glass-insulated tungsten extracellular electrode implanted within range of six neurons in the spider’s brain registered data in the form of voltage spikes.
Shamble then helped Menda design and 3-D print harnesses for the male and female spiders. Refrigeration and a drop of wax immobilized them for study. Now that jumping spider vision was no longer a hypothetical research topic, Cornell grad students outside the Hoy lab took note. Soon, James Golden, a computational neuroscientist, and Eyal Nitzany, a biological statistician, joined the team. The foursome collaborated on experimental design and obtained the first recordings from the visual processing centers of the spiders’ tiny brains (Current Biology, 24:2580-85, 2014).
You could put a hundred jumping spiders along the frame of your glasses. If you could turn those eyes onto what your eyes were doing, you would have a gangbusters eye tracker.—Ron Hoy,
Cornell University
Menda recalls one day of that project in particular. He’d come into the lab early to take out the spiders and start recording neuron activity while using the visual stimuli Nitzany had developed. He showed an immobilized spider potential mates and its natural prey, flies, on a screen.
“I saw that [the spider] concentrated on only one from the variety I was showing him,” he explains. It was the prey stimulus that held the spider’s attention. The longer the spider focused, the more spikes Menda recorded. “I was like, ‘Whoa! This is recognition of the object. This is really interesting.’” Immediately, he sent out a group text, imploring fellow grad students and Hoy to drop what they were doing and come to the lab. They did—and they stayed all day, watching the live recording, developing new stimuli to test, and building computer programs that could sort and analyze the incoming data right then and there.
“I’ve had a lot of graduate students in my time,” Hoy says. “It’s usually one student, one problem, and everyone is working at their own cubicle. But in this case, it was kind of like mission control!”
The Cornell team discovered that it’s not just that the jumping spider has eight incredible eyes—it’s that it uses them together. When Golden’s algorithms sorted the thousands of recorded neural spikes into individual classes by height and shape, the researchers saw that the neurons interacted differently depending on the stimuli the spider was shown. Jumping spiders, which are roughly the size of a pencil eraser, are able to process visual information gathered by any of their eight eyes, decide what action they need to take depending on what the stimulus is, and then alter their body position and behavior accordingly.
Collaboration was key to the project’s success. “To really make a bigger impact, to see a problem from multiple perspectives, this kind of research is critical to arrive at novel insight and novel solutions,” says John Wen, a roboticist at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute in Troy, New York, who was not involved in the study.
Meanwhile, the Cornell team’s ongoing work—using the same microelectrode to record neuron activity in other spiders, wasps, dragonflies, bumblebees, and monkeys—has important implications for Wen’s field. As technology becomes increasingly focused on high performance in small packages, the team’s research offers a visual processing solution on a precise nano- and microscale. Hoy says that for scientists studying dyslexia and autism, “to be able to monitor eye movements in miniature would be fantastic.”
The current commercial eye tracker market is dominated by slim, Nintendo Wii-like tracking bars and Google Glass–style wearables. These devices typically max out at five or six fingertip-size cameras, and can be intrusive and limited in their ability to capture data points as the subject’s head moves, which makes them difficult to use successfully when studying children and young adults with developmental disorders (J Vis Exp, doi 10.3791/3675, 2012).
But studying the jumping spider’s tiny visual processing system could lend insights that pave the way for eight cameras and a communication network far smaller than a pinky. “You could put a hundred jumping spiders along the frame of your glasses,” Hoy says. “If you could turn those eyes onto what your eyes were doing, you would have a gangbusters eye tracker.”
Nitzany offers a more macro application: subway surveillance cameras. “You have thousands of people going through the subway, and you need to know which one you need to focus on,” Nitzany explains. “You don’t want to focus on everyone. You have to know how to integrate all those signals so you only focus on the most important one. This is very much the same task as the jumping spider [does].”
It’s all part of the charisma of the jumping spider, whose specialness Hoy finds impossible to overstate. “It’s like they’ve been cast from web heaven to earth, where they have to find their own food and find mates,” he says. “People had pretty much given up on recording from them, but with good luck, a good set of hands, and a great team, we managed to crack it.”

Wednesday, April 8, 2015

THIS WOMAN SEES 100 TIMES MORE COLORS THAN THE AVERAGE PERSON

reposted from POP Sci - thanks Ilona,

THIS WOMAN SEES 100 TIMES MORE COLORS THAN THE AVERAGE PERSON

A UNIQUE GENETIC MUTATION AND A WELL-WIRED BRAIN MEAN THAT CONCETTA ANTICO IS LIKE NO OTHER ARTIST ON EARTH.
  
 1.1K 
To tetrachromatic artist Concetta Antico, the world is, "like a mosaic of color."
When Concetta Antico looks at a leaf, she sees much more than just green. “Around the edge I’ll see orange or red or purple in the shadow; you might see dark green but I’ll see violet, turquoise, blue,” she said. “It’s like a mosaic of color.”
Antico doesn’t just perceive these colors because she’s an artist who paints in the impressionist style. She’s also a tetrachromat, which means that she has more receptors in her eyes to absorb color. The difference lies in Antico's cones, structures in the eyes that are calibrated to absorb particular wavelengths of light and transmit them to the brain. The average person has three cones, which enables him to see about one million colors. But Antico has four cones, so her eyes are capable of picking up dimensions and nuances of color—an estimated 100 million of them—that the average person cannot. “It’s shocking to me how little color people are seeing,” she said.
"You might see dark green but I’ll see violet, turquoise, blue. It’s like a mosaic of color.”
Although tetrachromats have more receptors in their eyes, their brains are wired the same way as a person with normal vision. So how can a brain like Antico’s change to see more colors? Like anything else, practice makes perfect, even when it comes to neural pathways.
For years, researchers weren’t sure tetrachromacy existed. If it did, they stipulated, it could only be found in people with two X chromosomes. This is because of the genes behind color vision. People who have regular color vision have three cones, tuned to the wavelengths of red, green, and blue. These are connected to the X chromosome—most men have only one, but most women have two. Mutations in the X chromosome cause a person to perceive more or less color, which is why men more commonly have congenital colorblindness than women (if their one X chromosome has a mutation). But the theory stood that if a person received two mutated X chromosomes, she could have four cones instead of the usual three.
This is the case with Antico; researchers confirmed that she is a tetrachromat in 2012. One percent of the world’s population is thought to be tetrachromatic, but it’s not easy to demonstrate empirically. “The difference between
[the color dimensions perceived by]
a tetrachromat and someone with normal vision is not as dramatic as the difference between someone who is colorblind and someone with normal vision,” according to Kimberly Jameson, a cognitive scientist at the Institute for Mathematical Behavioral Sciences at the University of California in Irvine. She and her colleague Alissa Winkler at the University of Nevada in Reno have been studying Antico for about a year to better understand tetrachromacy. The differences in color perception are hard to detect because they’re small, Jameson said, but the tests that are currently used are not designed for more than three pigments--red, green and blue.
Based on Antico's genes, Jameson has determined that Antico's fourth cone absorbs wavelengths that are "reddish-orangey-yellow, but what it appears to Concetta is uncertain at the moment," she added. Since the tests aren't calibrated for this wavelength, empirically demonstrating tetrachromacy is still really difficult.
"Rainbow Gully, Mission Hills, SD"
Jameson and Winkler are on the hunt for more tetrachromats in order to better understand how their brains work. Jameson became fascinated with how people are able to form and communicate concepts, especially when the way they perceive the world can vary so widely. “If you have an extra cone class in the retina, that greatly complicates how that signal might be taking shape as it leaves the retina. We want to understand how that’s happening,” she said. This likely has to do with how the brain wires itself when it receives certain signals frequently over time—a concept called neuroplasticityLots ofstudies about neuroplasticity in animals and some in humans have shown that two individuals with the same capacity for visual perception can have drastically different vision later in life just based on what they were exposed to early on. Researchers still aren’t totally sure why this is the case. “One possibility is that the system learns how to use these signals—the wiring creates the proper code so they can be used in the cortex,” Jameson said.
So even though many more tetrachromats may exist in the world, they may not have exceptional color perception, because they haven’t trained their brains to pay attention. Antico, in this case, presents a rare exception. “I was different than a regular 5-year-old — I was painting at age 7, I was so fascinated with color,” she said. For years, she was exposed to exceptional color, so her brain became wired to take advantage of her tetrachromacy.
"The Cat's Meow"
Antico has a personal stake in the continued research of tetrachromacy. Five years ago, when Antico’s daughter was 7 years old, the family learned that she was colorblind. “I didn’t think it had anything to do with me, but she’s colorblind because of me. I have a mutation,” Antico said. The more she helps scientists understand tetrachromacy, she figures, the better they will be able to help people like her daughter. “If we understand genetic potential for tetrachromacy and how their perception differs, we can understand quite a lot about visual processing of color that we currently don’t understand,” Jameson agreed.
But Antico may have stumbled upon a different way to help those who are color deficient. She is a professional artist who has been teaching painting for over 20 years, and she has a number of students who are colorblind. “One of the things that has been made apparent by looking at their artwork is that they have a good appreciation for color, unlike any other individual who I’ve ever seen that is color deficient,” Jameson said. “It’s very possible that by being tuned in from a very early age to color differences,
[Antico]
may have acquired some understanding and articulation for how to help them do that.” This hypothesis still needs to be proven empirically, of course, but Jameson is intrigued by the prospect of improving people’s perception of color through the training that neuroplasticity allows.
In addition to spending her time helping researchers better understand tetrachromacy, Antico hopes to open an art school for the colorblind and create an online platform for people around the world to discover if they are tetrachromatic. “I want to be sure before I die that I’m able to define tetrochromatism,” she said. “There have to be more tetrachromats out there. Maybe I can lead the way for that.”
Correction (11/10/2014, 11:40 a.m. ET): The original story stated that all men have one X and one Y chromosome and that all women have two X chromosomes. This statement neglected to include those with Klinefelter Syndrome and transgender individuals. We regret the error.
TAGS:

Tuesday, May 6, 2014

Extra Eyeballs on the Eye

reposted from

Extra Eyeballs on the Eye

A legion of citizen-scientist gamers helps a team of researchers explain a long-standing riddle of how the retina processes motion.
By  | May 6, 2014
  • Link this
  • Stumble


WIKIMEDIA, AMY LEE ROBINSONResearchers have solved a 50-year mystery of how the retina processes motion with the aid of citizen scientists playing an online game, according to a study published this week (May 4) in Nature. A team led by Sebastian Seung of MIT found that two bipolar neurons in the retina firing together activate a third neuron, a starburst amacrine cell, which is wired to the brain.
Initially, scientists thought the eye passed all visual information for processing up to the brain. Since the mid-1960s, though, researchers have realized that the retina is sensitive to direction and speed.
Seung is the creator of a neuron-mapping game called EyeWire. More than 120,000 gamers from 140 countries helped Seung’s team to map and color-code individual neurons and their connections in the retina. The researchers used retinal neuron wiring diagram created by the players and pieced together by Seung’s team to understand what was going on inside the retina.
“This is a very nice paper that poses a very clear and testable prediction about direction-selective computation in the retina,” neuroscientist Botond Roska from the Friedrich Miescher Institute for Biomedical Research in Basel, Switzerland, who was not involved in the study, told Nature News. “It’s an exciting idea, and I bet it’ll be followed by research from many labs trying test this hypothesis.”
Seung noted that the wiring diagram depicts a small fraction of the total neural connections in the retina. “There are probably other neurons that are a part of this motion-detection circuit,” he told Nature. “We need to map those out and eventually reconstruct the entire retinal connectome.”