Showing posts with label BMI. Show all posts
Showing posts with label BMI. Show all posts

Wednesday, September 9, 2015

The Sounds of Silence: Science-based tinnitus therapeutics are finally coming into their own.

reposted from here

The Sounds of Silence

Science-based tinnitus therapeutics are finally coming into their own.
By  | September 1, 2015
STOP THE RINGING: Tinnitus can manifest early in auditory perception, as damage to the inner ear, or in the brain where sounds are processed. Researchers developing treatments for the condition are targeting various points along this pathway.
See full infographic: JPG
© MARI SCHMITT/SCIENCE SOURCE; © ENCYCLOPEDIA BRITANNICA/UIG/GETTY IMAGES
It often starts off with a bang. Many a soldier, construction worker, concertgoer, or innocent passerby exposed to a loud noise walks away with the telltale symptom of tinnitus, a persistent ringing in the ears. The condition can also arise from other ear traumas, such as middle-ear infections or exposure to high pressure while scuba diving, and begins with damage to the hair cells in the cochlea of the inner ear or to the auditory nerve. Until recently, such damage was thought to be the cause of the phantom sounds that plague tinnitus sufferers. Now, researchers are realizing that it’s much more complex than that.
“Damage to hair cells and auditory nerve fibers sets the stage for the development of tinnitus,” says Jennifer Melcher of the Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary. But the true culprit is really the brain, which eventually begins to compensate for the loss of input from the ear by “turning up the volume” on the sound signals it is trying to pick up, she adds. Navzer Engineer, chief scientific officer of Dallas-based MicroTransponder, which is developing a neurostimulative treatment for tinnitus, agrees: “Cells in the brain don’t stay dormant” even though they have lost input from the ear, he says.
It’s unclear when the condition transitions from the ear to the brain. Researchers also do not yet know whether the brain or peripheral nerves are primarily responsible for amplifying the spontaneous neural activity in the auditory pathway. But in the end the effect is the same: the brain begins to capture sounds of its own creation. “The pathology is in the ear . . . but the sounds are generated by the brain,” says Engineer.
The University of Regensburg’s Berthold Langguth, chairman of the executive committee of the Tinnitus Research Initiative, likens the compensatory sound to the phantom limb sensation experienced by amputees. And like the phenomenon of phantom limbs, there’s not just a single brain region at fault. In addition to the auditory cortex, the limbic cortex—particularly the amygdala, the brain’s emotional center—as well as the temporal, parietal, and sensorimotor cortex areas have all been implicated in tinnitus perception (Curr Biol, 25:1208-14, 2015; eLife, 4:e06576, 2015).
A better scientific understanding of tinnitus could be key to developing an effective treatment. One in five Americans has tinnitus, including more than a million veterans who experienced loud noises in the line of duty, and many suffer a severe form of the disorder. Yet treatment options are largely limited to cognitive behavioral therapy to learn to tune out the sound and physical exercises such as contracting the head and neck muscles (by clenching their jaw, for example) to adjust the rogue sound’s pitch or loudness. For those who continue to suffer significant psychological and emotional consequences of tinnitus, there has been no pharmaceutical treatment or cure. “It’s a very desperate group,” Engineer says.

Inside the ear

The most advanced treatment in development for tinnitus targets the auditory neurons that connect the hair cells of the inner ear to the auditory cortex. In the mid-1990s, researchers at Inserm in Montpellier, France, found that chemically inducing tinnitus in rats was associated with upregulated N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptors on the animals’ cochlear neurons (J Neurosci, 23:3944-52, 2003). NMDA receptors play a role in forming new synapses at these neurons, and regulate the levels of other neuronal receptors. In 2003, teaming up with Swiss entrepreneur Thomas Meyer and his company Auris Medical, the Inserm researchers also observed such increased levels of NMDA receptors in rodents suffering from noise-induced tinnitus. Prior to noise trauma, the animals had been trained to jump onto a pole in response to a sound, and after trauma, rodents with tinnitus continued these behaviors, even in the absence of an external tone.
To treat the condition, the group set about designing a drug that would block NMDA receptors. These days, Auris is testing the small-molecule drug S-ketamine in two Phase 3 trials of trauma-induced tinnitus patients. The treatment, delivered directly into the inner ear via three injections over three days, must catch the disorder while the problem is still within the ear, before the brain has begun overcompensating for the loss of hearing. Once that happens, no amount of adjustment to the receptors on the auditory nerves will do any good.
Because it is not known when that transition from ear to brain occurs, one of the current trials, of 300 European patients, is specifically testing tinnitus sufferers who have developed the condition no more than three months prior to treatment. The other, a study of 330 North American patients, is investigating a therapy within one year post-trauma. Preliminary results suggest that S-ketamine is effective beyond three months, but declines in effectiveness within a year of the initial trauma, so later stages of the trial are being refocused on the four- to six-month time frame. The trials will be completed at the end of this year, and Auris hopes to submit to the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for approval in the summer of 2016.
“[The hope is] that this might show benefits and might become the first drug to be approved for the treatment of tinnitus,” says Langguth, who is not affiliated with Auris. Because the therapeutic is delivered directly into the ear, he thinks that it will be particularly useful for patients who also suffer from hearing loss, an extremely common comorbidity of tinnitus.
S-ketamine will probably not work for all tinnitus sufferers, however, says Meyer. “We feel it’s important to get started and then see what else can be done with this.”

Chemically modifying neurons

Meanwhile, other researchers are developing therapies that target the brain to treat patients whose tinnitus has progressed to the auditory cortex. One strategy currently under investigation is the manipulation of the potassium channels found throughout the auditory pathway. “[Using] potassium channel modulators, the activity in the central auditory pathway can be changed,” Langguth says.
In tinnitus, the auditory maps in the brain rewire themselves without external stimulation.
U.K.-based Autifony Therapeutics began in 2011 as an outgrowth of GlaxoSmithKline’s investigation of potassium channels in the auditory system. Autifony CEO Charles Large and his colleague Giuseppe Alvaro are focusing on the development of the previously unexamined Kv3 potassium channels, which exist throughout the brain and in high abundance on the auditory nerve and cortex, allowing the neurons to signal rapidly. After exposure to loud noises, these channels can be damaged and fail to properly conduct ions, making them an ideal drug target for the treatment of tinnitus.
Working with academic collaborators, Autifony researchers developed a small-molecule drug that enhances the function of the Kv3 channels. In rodent models, the drug reduced the spontaneous neural activity in the midbrain auditory system associated with tinnitus. “We’re dampening down a spurious activity that is believed to give rise to the phantom perception,” says Large. “We have a lot of confidence from our preclinical work that we should see some interesting effects in people with tinnitus.”
Autifony researchers are currently recruiting patients for Phase 2 trials in the U.K. In contrast to Auris Medical’s target patient population, Autifony focuses on people whose tinnitus is established in the brain and who have had the disorder for at least six months (but no more than 18 months). The treatment is currently taken as a daily oral pill for 28 days, although the length of the treatment course is still under investigation.
“Autifony is really quite unique in having a drug treatment that’s been rationally designed around the idea that we can dampen down the hyperexcitability that we see in the nervous system,” Large says.

Retraining the brain

For patients with chronic tinnitus beyond the 18-month window being targeted by Autifony, a third potential treatment is making its way through clinical trials. MicroTransponder’s therapy is a riff on a decades-old treatment for epilepsy and depression called vagus-nerve stimulation. More than 90,000 patients have undergone such treatment.
MicroTransponder was started out of Michael Kilgard’s lab at the University of Texas, Dallas, where Engineer conducted his postdoctoral research. In 1998, Kilgard’s group published a rat study demonstrating that direct stimulation of the nucleus basalis of the forebrain could be paired with the playing of a particular tone to change how sounds map to the brain’s auditory cortex (Science, 279:1714-18). The researchers were later able to accomplish the same sound remapping in the rat brain by stimulating the more-accessible vagus nerve, which projects to the nucleus basalis (Nature, 470:101-04, 2011).
The auditory maps in the brains of tinnitus sufferers rewire themselves without external stimulation. In the human inner ear, the cochlea contains more than 3,500 inner hair cells, each of which is tuned to a single frequency. As these cells are damaged by loud noise, infection, or other insults, the brain is deprived of normal input from the ear at particular frequencies. As a result, neurons that represent adjacent frequencies expand their range to include the missing frequencies. These neighboring neurons begin to fire spontaneously, sending phantom signals to create the perceived sound of tinnitus. Kilgard’s work suggests that retraining the auditory cortex by pairing tones with electrical stimulation could correct such abnormal firing. “There was the idea that maybe there could be specific forms of auditory stimulation which could have a beneficial effect,” Langguth says.
Engineer’s stimulation therapy has successfully stemmed tinnitus in a rat model, in which the animals were exposed to a loud noise that impaired their hearing. The treatment, now in human trials, involves two incisions in the neck and chest wall to insert a helical electrode, which winds around the left vagus nerve in the neck, and wires to connect the electrode to a pacemaker-like pulse generator in the chest. The researchers determine the pitch of a patient’s tinnitus by playing various tones until the patient reports a match with the perceived sound, then pair tones near but not at the tinnitus pitch with vagus-nerve stimulation in half-second pulses. The idea is to train the brain regions that have begun to fire spontaneously—and cause tinnitus—to respond only to the non-tinnitus frequencies that the ear actually hears. “[It] actually reverts the auditory cortex map down to normal,” Engineer says. Vagus-nerve stimulation or the tones by themselves don’t work, he noted. “The key is the pairing.” The course of treatment is a 2.5-hour daily listening session for six weeks.
In a preliminary 10-patient study in Belgium, about half of patients with chronic tinnitus improved (Neuromodulation, 17:170-79, 2014). However, the researchers noted decreased efficacy if the patients were on antidepressants. Stimulating the vagus nerve causes the release of the neurotransmitters norepinephrine and acetylcholine. Antidepressant medications can interfere with this release, suggesting that these natural chemicals are required for the vagus-nerve stimulation treatment for tinnitus to work. The proof-of-concept trial was followed up by a larger-scale study of 30 patients at four sites in the U.S. that concluded this April. The most common side effect was a hoarse voice, but otherwise the treatment is considered safe. Results from the trial will be published this autumn, but Engineer says that the data look promising.

Looking ahead

While there is still no approved drug to treat tinnitus, Meyer of Auris Medical is optimistic that the future for patients suffering from the disorder is bright. “We have learned a tremendous amount over the last few years. We know things we absolutely had no idea about 10 years ago,” he says. In addition to the therapies currently in trials for acute tinnitus, “I believe that long-term there will be also solutions for chronic tinnitus,” he adds.
Meanwhile, further research into the pathophysiology of the disease will be critical to develop targeted treatments. “There’s not one tinnitus,” Langguth says. “There are probably many forms, which differ in their mechanisms and differ in their best possible treatment.” Studies that help scientists better delineate these different forms of tinnitus into clinically meaningful subgroups will likely inform future drug targets, he adds.
“The hearing space is where ophthalmology was 10 or 12 years ago,” says Autifony executive Barbara Domayne-Hayman. At that time, the basic research community was not that interested in certain eye disorders, “whereas now it’s an extremely hot and active space. We think that hearing is going to go in exactly the same way,” she adds.

Thursday, November 20, 2014

Monkeys Learn to Steer Wheelchair

reposted from

Monkeys Learn to Steer Wheelchair

A brain-computer interface uses the animals’ brain activity to steer them to a food reward.
By  | November 19, 2014
  • Link this
  • Stumble
Researchers use a brain-computer interface to allow monkeys to steer a wheelchair-like cart to a food reward.KATIE ZHUANGTraining a monkey to navigate a wheelchair is as easy as letting the animals go for a few rides—that is, assuming they have electrodes implanted into their brains that allow researchers to decode their neural activity and use it to steer the chair via a brain-computer interface (BCI). Researchers in the Duke University lab of Miguel Nicolelis, who helped design and build the exoskeleton that allowed a paralyzed man to kick off this summer's World Cupgames, presented their work on two wheelchair-driving monkeys at this week's Society for Neuroscience (SfN) conference being held in Washington, DC.
The team first recorded activity in the motor and sensory cortices of monkeys riding around in the chair. A computer decoder then correlated this neural activity with the direction of movement of the chair, and after the training period was over, the BCI worked in reverse—using the neural inputs to actually steer the chair. Both monkeys eventually learned to steer the chair across the room to a grape dispenser, where they received their food reward. “We show that the monkeys learn to drive,” Duke postdoc Po-He Tseng told The Scientist. “They want the grape.”
Whether the results can be generalized to the neural activity of monkey navigation remains to be seen, but “I think it’s a big step from navigation in virtual environment,” Tseng said. “Although our work [is] not close to how monkeys navigate in the jungles or on the trees, [it] allows the monkeys to navigate on a wheelchair in the real world.”
Moreover, the group recorded from a similar set of neurons as has been done when training monkeys to move a cursor on a computer screen, noted collaborator Allen Yin, a graduate student in Nicolelis's lab. “This is significant because unlike actuators such as cursors and robotic arms used in many other [BCI] experiments, a wheelchair is much less similar to a monkey’s limbs. We may then extrapolate this to hypothesize that a monkey may be able to control apparatus more complex than a wheelchair via [BCI].”
(For more on BCIs, see this month's feature story, “Neuroprosthetics.”)

Thursday, February 20, 2014

Monkey Mind Control

reposted from


Monkey Mind Control

The brain activity of one monkey dictated movements of a second, sedated animal, a study shows.
By  | February 19, 2014
  • Link this
  • Stumble
Rhesus monkeyFLICKR, SHANKAR S.Researchers have used two rhesus monkeys in an intriguing proof-of-principle experiment testing the ability to control a paralyzed body or limb. They used a machine to covert the brain activity of one monkey, called the master, into electrical impulses applied to the spinal cord of a sedated animal, called an avatar, which moved in response to the stimulation.
The results, published this week (February 17) inNature Communications, could provide insight for how thoughts might be translated into movement of paralyzed patients.
“This work in primates shows how this disconnection between brain and controlled movement could be overcome using brain machine interfaces that have the ability to identify the user’s intention or desire to perform a specific movement and, once identified, how this intended action can be translated through neural stimulation into the muscle activations that achieve the final goal of the movement,” biomedical engineer Bernard Conway of the University of Strathclyde said in a statement. “The work is a key step forward that demonstrates the potential of brain machine interfaces to be used in restoring purposeful movement to people affected by paralysis.”
The scientists, who hailed from Harvard Medical School, implanted a brain chip capable of monitoring 100 neurons into the master monkey, recorded the cells’ electrical activity during training, and then matched the patterns of neural activity with the physical actions of the monkey. The researchers also implanted 36 electrodes in the spinal cord of the avatar monkey, then tested how the activation of the electrodes could elicit different movements from the animal.
Finally, the team connected the two monkeys to each other, such that the activity being recorded from the master’s brain controlled the movements of the avatar in real time. The master was to control the movement of a cursor using a joystick held by the avatar, and, 98 percent of the time, it succeeded.
“The goal is to take people with brain stem or spinal cord paralysis and bypass the injury,” Ziv Williams, told BBC News. “The hope is ultimately to get completely natural movement, I think it’s theoretically possible, but it will require an exponential additional effort to get to that point.”
“Whilst the control of limbs is sophisticated, it is still rather crude overall,” Christopher James of the University of Warwick agreed in a statement. Additionally, increased muscle rigidity following paralysis, as well as changes in blood pressure, pose challenges for restoring precise control.
Nevertheless, James said that the implications of the new research were profound, “especially for controlling limbs in spinal cord injury, or controlling prosthetic limbs with limb amputees.”

Wednesday, November 13, 2013

Researcher controls colleague’s motions in 1st human brain-to-brain interface

reposted from
http://www.washington.edu/news/2013/08/27/researcher-controls-colleagues-motions-in-1st-human-brain-to-brain-interface/

August 27, 2013

Researcher controls colleague’s motions in 1st human brain-to-brain interface

Doree Armstrong and Michelle Ma
News and Information

University of Washington researchers have performed what they believe is the first noninvasive human-to-human brain interface, with one researcher able to send a brain signal via the Internet to control the hand motions of a fellow researcher.
A photo showing both sides of the demonstration.
University of Washington
University of Washington researcher Rajesh Rao, left, plays a computer game with his mind. Across campus, researcher Andrea Stocco, right, wears a magnetic stimulation coil over the left motor cortex region of his brain. Stocco’s right index finger moved involuntarily to hit the “fire” button as part of the first human brain-to-brain interface demonstration.
Using electrical brain recordings and a form of magnetic stimulation, Rajesh Rao sent a brain signal to Andrea Stocco on the other side of the UW campus, causing Stocco’s finger to move on a keyboard.
While researchers at Duke University have demonstrated brain-to-brain communication between two rats, and Harvard researchers have demonstrated it between a human and a rat, Rao and Stocco believe this is the first demonstration of human-to-human brain interfacing.
“The Internet was a way to connect computers, and now it can be a way to connect brains,” Stocco said. “We want to take the knowledge of a brain and transmit it directly from brain to brain.”
The researchers captured the full demonstration on video recorded in both labs. The following version has been edited for length. This video and high-resolution photos also are available on the research website.
Rao, a UW professor of computer science and engineering, has been working on brain-computer interfacing in his lab for more than 10 years and just published a textbook on the subject. In 2011, spurred by the rapid advances in technology, he believed he could demonstrate the concept of human brain-to-brain interfacing. So he partnered with Stocco, a UW research assistant professor in psychology at the UW’s Institute for Learning & Brain Sciences.
On Aug. 12, Rao sat in his lab wearing a cap with electrodes hooked up to anelectroencephalography machine, which reads electrical activity in the brain. Stocco was in his lab across campus wearing a purple swim cap marked with the stimulation site for thetranscranial magnetic stimulation coil that was placed directly over his left motor cortex, which controls hand movement.
The team had a Skype connection set up so the two labs could coordinate, though neither Rao nor Stocco could see the Skype screens.
Rao looked at a computer screen and played a simple video game with his mind. When he was supposed to fire a cannon at a target, he imagined moving his right hand (being careful not to actually move his hand), causing a cursor to hit the “fire” button. Almost instantaneously, Stocco, who wore noise-canceling earbuds and wasn’t looking at a computer screen, involuntarily moved his right index finger to push the space bar on the keyboard in front of him, as if firing the cannon. Stocco compared the feeling of his hand moving involuntarily to that of a nervous tic.
“It was both exciting and eerie to watch an imagined action from my brain get translated into actual action by another brain,” Rao said. “This was basically a one-way flow of information from my brain to his. The next step is having a more equitable two-way conversation directly between the two brains.”
A diagram showing the cycle of the brain-to-brain interface demonstration.
University of Washington
The cycle of the experiment. Brain signals from the “Sender” are recorded. When the computer detects imagined hand movements, a “fire” command is transmitted over the Internet to the TMS machine, which causes an upward movement of the right hand of the “Receiver.” This usually results in the “fire” key being hit.
The technologies used by the researchers for recording and stimulating the brain are both well-known. Electroencephalography, or EEG, is routinely used by clinicians and researchers to record brain activity noninvasively from the scalp. Transcranial magnetic stimulation is a noninvasive way of delivering stimulation to the brain to elicit a response. Its effect depends on where the coil is placed; in this case, it was placed directly over the brain region that controls a person’s right hand. By activating these neurons, the stimulation convinced the brain that it needed to move the right hand.
Computer science and engineering undergraduates Matthew Bryan, Bryan Djunaedi, Joseph Wu and Alex Dadgar, along with bioengineering graduate student Dev Sarma, wrote the computer code for the project, translating Rao’s brain signals into a command for Stocco’s brain.
“Brain-computer interface is something people have been talking about for a long, long time,” said Chantel Prat, assistant professor in psychology at the UW’s Institute for Learning & Brain Sciences, and Stocco’s wife and research partner who helped conduct the experiment. “We plugged a brain into the most complex computer anyone has ever studied, and that is another brain.”
At first blush, this breakthrough brings to mind all kinds of science fiction scenarios. Stocco jokingly referred to it as a “Vulcan mind meld.” But Rao cautioned this technology only reads certain kinds of simple brain signals, not a person’s thoughts. And it doesn’t give anyone the ability to control your actions against your will.
Both researchers were in the lab wearing highly specialized equipment and under ideal conditions. They also had to obtain and follow a stringent set of international human-subject testing rules to conduct the demonstration.
“I think some people will be unnerved by this because they will overestimate the technology,” Prat said. “There’s no possible way the technology that we have could be used on a person unknowingly or without their willing participation.”
Stocco said years from now the technology could be used, for example, by someone on the ground to help a flight attendant or passenger land an airplane if the pilot becomes incapacitated. Or a person with disabilities could communicate his or her wish, say, for food or water. The brain signals from one person to another would work even if they didn’t speak the same language.
Rao and Stocco next plan to conduct an experiment that would transmit more complex information from one brain to the other. If that works, they then will conduct the experiment on a larger pool of subjects.
### 
For more information, contact Rao at rao@cs.washington.edu or 206-685-9141, and Stocco atstocco@uw.edu or 206-685-8610. Video and high-resolution photos are available on theresearch website.